ToxSci Advance Access published online on July 27, 2008
Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfn149
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abnormal Liver Development and Resistance to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Toxicity in Mice Carrying a Mutation in the DNA Binding Domain of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor
,

,
* McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research
Molecular and Environmental Toxicology Center
Departments of Surgery and Psychology
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Christopher A. Bradfield, Ph.D., McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, 1400 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, Phone: (608)-262-024, Fax: (608)-262-2824, Email: bradfield{at}oncology.wisc.edu
Received July 16, 2008; revision received July 16, 2008; accepted July 18, 2008
| Abstract |
|---|
The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AHR) is known for its role in the adaptive and toxic responses to a large number of environmental contaminants, as well as its role in hepatovascular development. The classical AHR pathway involves ligand binding, nuclear translocation, heterodimerization with the AHR nuclear translocator (ARNT), and binding of the heterodimer to dioxin response elements, thereby modulating the transcription of an array of genes. The AHR has also been implicated in signaling events independent of nuclear localization and DNA binding, and it has been suggested that such pathways may play important roles in the toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Here, we report the generation of a mouse model that expresses an AHR protein capable of ligand binding, interactions with chaperone proteins, functional heterodimerization with ARNT, and nuclear translocation, but is unable to bind dioxin response elements. Using this model, we provide evidence that DNA binding is required AHR-mediated liver development, as Ahrdbd/dbd mice exhibit a patent ductus venosus, similar to what is seen in Ahr-/- mice. Furthermore, Ahrdbd/dbd mice are resistant to TCDD-induced toxicity for all endpoints tested. These data suggest that DNA binding is necessary for AHR-mediated developmental and toxic signaling.
Key Words: Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor; dioxin; TCDD; ductus venosus.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Jenny, S. I. Karchner, D. G. Franks, B. R. Woodin, J. J. Stegeman, and M. E. Hahn Distinct Roles of Two Zebrafish AHR Repressors (AHRRa and AHRRb) in Embryonic Development and Regulating the Response to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2009; 110(2): 426 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nukaya, S. Moran, and C. A. Bradfield The role of the dioxin-responsive element cluster between the Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 loci in aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology PNAS, March 24, 2009; 106(12): 4923 - 4928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Perdew Ah Receptor Binding to its Cognate Response Element is Required for Dioxin-Mediated Toxicity Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2008; 106(2): 301 - 303. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

