Skip Navigation



ToxSci Advance Access published online on July 27, 2008

Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfn149
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
106/1/83    most recent
kfn149v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bunger, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Bradfield, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bunger, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Bradfield, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org


Abnormal Liver Development and Resistance to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Toxicity in Mice Carrying a Mutation in the DNA Binding Domain of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor

Maureen K. Bunger*, Edward Glover*, Susan M. Moran*, Jacqueline A. Walisser*, Garet P. Lahvis*,{dagger},{ddagger}, Erin L. Hsu*,{dagger} and Christopher A. Bradfield*,{dagger},§

* McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research {dagger} Molecular and Environmental Toxicology Center {ddagger} Departments of Surgery and Psychology University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Christopher A. Bradfield, Ph.D., McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, 1400 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, Phone: (608)-262-024, Fax: (608)-262-2824, Email: bradfield{at}oncology.wisc.edu

Received July 16, 2008; revision received July 16, 2008; accepted July 18, 2008


   Abstract

The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AHR) is known for its role in the adaptive and toxic responses to a large number of environmental contaminants, as well as its role in hepatovascular development. The classical AHR pathway involves ligand binding, nuclear translocation, heterodimerization with the AHR nuclear translocator (ARNT), and binding of the heterodimer to dioxin response elements, thereby modulating the transcription of an array of genes. The AHR has also been implicated in signaling events independent of nuclear localization and DNA binding, and it has been suggested that such pathways may play important roles in the toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Here, we report the generation of a mouse model that expresses an AHR protein capable of ligand binding, interactions with chaperone proteins, functional heterodimerization with ARNT, and nuclear translocation, but is unable to bind dioxin response elements. Using this model, we provide evidence that DNA binding is required AHR-mediated liver development, as Ahrdbd/dbd mice exhibit a patent ductus venosus, similar to what is seen in Ahr-/- mice. Furthermore, Ahrdbd/dbd mice are resistant to TCDD-induced toxicity for all endpoints tested. These data suggest that DNA binding is necessary for AHR-mediated developmental and toxic signaling.

Key Words: Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor; dioxin; TCDD; ductus venosus.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
M. J. Jenny, S. I. Karchner, D. G. Franks, B. R. Woodin, J. J. Stegeman, and M. E. Hahn
Distinct Roles of Two Zebrafish AHR Repressors (AHRRa and AHRRb) in Embryonic Development and Regulating the Response to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2009; 110(2): 426 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Nukaya, S. Moran, and C. A. Bradfield
The role of the dioxin-responsive element cluster between the Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 loci in aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology
PNAS, March 24, 2009; 106(12): 4923 - 4928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
G. H. Perdew
Ah Receptor Binding to its Cognate Response Element is Required for Dioxin-Mediated Toxicity
Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2008; 106(2): 301 - 303.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.